Keywords
Flattery
History of Political Thought
History of Political Thought
How to Cite
Symposium on Dan Kapust’s Flattery and the History of Political Thought: That Glib and Oily Art. (2020). The Political Science Reviewer, 44(1), 223-255. https://politicalsciencereviewer.com/index.php/psr/article/view/658
Abstract
An Author-Meets-Critics symposium on Daniel J. Kapust's Flattery and the History of Political Thought: That Glib and Oily Art. It features critical reviews by Christina Bambrick, Gianna Englert, Ted H. Miller, and Brandon Turner.
Similar Articles
- Zachary K. German, What Prudence is Allowed to Produce , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- James Read, From Missouri Compromise to “House Divided” , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 43 No. 2 (2019): Symposium: The Missouri Compromise at 200
- Matthew Van Hook, Myth, Moderate, or Machiavellian? , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 44 No. 2 (2020): Symposium: Leadership and the History of Political Thought
- Richard G Stevens, Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 28 (1999): Martin Diamond’s Contribution to American Political Thought: A Symposium
- Editor's Note , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 49 No. 2 (2025): Special Issue: Christian Political Thought
- Stephen A McKnight, Medieval Order and Disorder in Voegelin’s History of Political Ideas , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Kenneth L Deutsch, Interwar German-Speaking Emigrés and American Political Thought , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 29 (2000): A Symposium on Herbert J Storing
- Khalil M Habib, Islam and the Divine Law in The Law of God , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 38 (2009): A Symposium on Rémi Brague’s <em>The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea</em>
- Alan Gibson, Lance Banning’s Interpretation of James Madison , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 32 (2003): A Symposium on Bertrand de Jouvenel
- Luke Mayville, Response to Commentators , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Gianna Englert, Democracy in America, America in France , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Christina Bambrick, The Promise of Virtue, Old and New , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 2 (2023): The Future Before Us: Early Career Women in Political Theory and Constitutional Studies
- Onur Ulas Ince, Burke A. Hendrix, Lida Maxwell, Ross Carroll, Brandon Turner, Daniel I. O’Neill, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Brandon Turner, O’Neill on Burke’s Not-Particularly- Conservative Logic of Empire , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 42 No. 1 (2018): Symposium: Philosophy in Weimar Germany
- Lee Ward, Brandon Turner, Michael Zuckert, Constantine Christos Vassiliou, Peter McNamara, Brianne Wolf, Author Meets Critics , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 47 No. 1 (2023): Political Theory and Economics, and other Essays
- Ryan Patrick Hanley, Daniel Mahoney, Brandon Turner, Brianne Wolf, Ian Crowe, Gregory M. Collins, Author Meets Critics: Commerce and Manners in Edmund Burke’s Political Economy , The Political Science Reviewer: Vol. 45 No. 2 (2021): Symposium: Russell Kirk in the 21st Century